<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Injury Law Blog and News &#187; Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/category/litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw</link>
	<description>Product Recall, Consumer Safety, and Personal Injury Litigation News and Commentary from National Plaintiffs&#039; Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Pregnancy and Birth Defects: Litigation Update</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/07/02/paxil-pregnancy-and-birth-defects-litigation-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/07/02/paxil-pregnancy-and-birth-defects-litigation-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych meds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlaxoSmithKline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paxil Birth Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paxil Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg News has reported that GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of the antidepressant prescription drug Paxil, has entered into settlements with nearly 200 families for a total of $1 billion.  The families charged in lawsuits that Paxil caused birth defects. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Bloomberg News</em> has reported that GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of the antidepressant prescription drug <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/paxil-during-pregnancy.htm">Paxil</a></span>, has entered into settlements with nearly 200 families for a total of $1 billion. The families charged in lawsuits that Paxil caused birth defects.</p>
<p>Paxil, Paxil Oral Suspension, and Paxil-CR are trade names of the drug Paroxetine, which is a member of a class of drugs known as “<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/newborns.htm ">selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors</a></span>” (SSRIs). A 2005 study based on 3,500 pregnant women, linked Paxil to twice as many birth defects compared to other antidepressants when taken during the first three months of pregnancy.</p>
<p>The birth defects identified in the study included congenital defects, heart defects and <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/newborns-pphn-definition.htm ">persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn</a></span> (PPHN), a potentially fatal disease.</p>
<p>If your child was born with <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/paxil-during-pregnancy.htm ">birth defects</a></span> and you were prescribed Paxil or other antidepressant drugs while pregnant, please <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/contact/contact-newborns.htm ">contact our law firm to learn about your rights</a></span> for no charge or obligation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/07/02/paxil-pregnancy-and-birth-defects-litigation-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota Recall: How Record Fine Impacts Toyota Sudden Acceleration Injury Lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/04/06/toyota-legal-foes-cheer-u-s-fine-say-lawsuits-will-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/04/06/toyota-legal-foes-cheer-u-s-fine-say-lawsuits-will-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden acceleration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota Motor Corp. may have a tough time defending itself in U.S. lawsuits filed for flaws in its vehicles after U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood fined the company, saying it "knowingly hid a dangerous defect."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported in the <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>, Toyota Motor Corp. may have a tough time defending itself in U.S. lawsuits filed for flaws in its vehicles after U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood fined the company, saying it &#8220;knowingly hid a dangerous defect.&#8221;</p>
<p>The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration yesterday proposed a record civil penalty of $16.4 million, less than 2 percent of Toyota projected net profit for the year ending March 31, related to a January recall of 2.3 million U.S. autos for accelerator pedals that allegedly stick. Toyota failed to act in a timely manner after knowing of the problem since at least September 2009, LaHood said.</p>
<p>&#8220;It certainly bolsters our cases,&#8221; said <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/bios/nelson.php">Robert J. Nelson</a>, a lawyer at San Francisco-based Lieff Cabraser Heimann &amp; Bernstein LLP, who has filed <a href="http://www.usautoinjurylaw.com/cases/defects/acceleration/toyota-lexus.htm">20 lawsuits on behalf of individual clients claiming personal injuries or deaths caused by sudden- acceleration incidents</a>. &#8220;It demonstrates Toyota has been less than forthright with the U.S. government and with consumers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Japanese automaker waited at least four months before telling the agency that accelerator pedals might stick, LaHood said yesterday in a statement. Companies have five business days to report safety defects, the agency said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/04/05/bloomberg1376-L0GK8A1A74E9-1.DTL" target="_blank">Read the full article</a> on the <em>SF Gate</em> website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/04/06/toyota-legal-foes-cheer-u-s-fine-say-lawsuits-will-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Two Washington Area Drivers Sue Toyota, Alleging Acceleration Problems in Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/03/15/washington-post-two-washington-area-drivers-sue-toyota-alleging-acceleration-problems-in-cars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/03/15/washington-post-two-washington-area-drivers-sue-toyota-alleging-acceleration-problems-in-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden acceleration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports that two Washington area drivers have filed personal injury lawsuits against the Toyota Motor Corp., joining about 280 personal injury and class-action suits filed across the country against the company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">The <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503364.html" target="_blank">reports</a> that two Washington area drivers have filed personal injury lawsuits against the Toyota Motor Corp., joining about 280 personal injury and class-action suits filed across the country against the company.</div>
<p>In their lawsuits, Andrew Flury of Pasadena and retired Army Col. Harry Williams of Woodbridge say they suffered severe injuries after the cars they were driving suddenly accelerated &#8212; an issue that generated a major recall of millions of Toyotas.</p>
<p>Their attorney, <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/bios/walburg.php">Todd Walburg</a> of Lieff Cabraser Heimann &amp; Bernstein, <a href="http://www.usautoinjurylaw.com/cases/defects/acceleration/toyota-lexus.htm" target="_self">blamed an electronic throttle system for the unintended acceleration and</a> said the system also operated without a brake override system that could have prevented throttle problems.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503364.html" target="_blank">Read the full article</a> on the <em>Washington Post</em> website. Learn more about <a href="http://www.usautoinjurylaw.com/cases/defects/acceleration/toyota-lexus.htm" target="_self">Toyota sudden acceleration accidents and the rights of victims</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/03/15/washington-post-two-washington-area-drivers-sue-toyota-alleging-acceleration-problems-in-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medtronic Heart Lead Recall Update: &#8220;[Sprint] Fidelis lead fracture rate is increasing exponentially with time&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/02/04/medtronic-heart-lead-recall-update-sprint-fidelis-lead-fracture-rate-is-increasing-exponentially-with-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/02/04/medtronic-heart-lead-recall-update-sprint-fidelis-lead-fracture-rate-is-increasing-exponentially-with-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medtronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis leads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In March 2009, Medtronic disclosed that at least 13 Sprint Fidelis patients may have died, including four patients whose deaths were related to efforts by doctors to surgically remove the product. In February 2010, the Wall Street Journal reported that the FDA database includes at least 12 additional deaths allegedly linked to the recalled device.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In October 2007, Medtronic issued a recall of its Sprint Fidelis heart lead. The device is a thin electrical cable that connects an implanted defibrillator to a patient&#8217;s heart which were implanted in over 200,000 patients.</p>
<p>When the Sprint Fidelis leads fracture, the defibrillator can fail to send a needed electrical jolt, and the patient can die. Or the defibrillator can send repeated, massive shocks, which can themselves be fatal.</p>
<p>In March 2009, Medtronic disclosed that at least 13 Sprint Fidelis patients may have died, including four patients whose deaths were related to efforts by doctors to surgically remove the product. Today, the <a title="WSJ" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704259304575043300593884216.html" target="_blank"><em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported</a> that the FDA database includes at least 12 additional deaths allegedly linked to the recalled device.</p>
<p>&#8220;The hazard of [Sprint] Fidelis lead fracture is increasing exponentially with time and, based on our data, occurring at a higher rate than the latest manufacturer&#8217;s performance update,&#8221; doctors at the University of Rochester concluded in findings published in the <a title="Am. Journal Cardiology" href="http://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002-9149(09)02220-6/abstract" target="_blank">January 2010 issue of the <em>American Journal of Cardiology</em></a> [abstract only].</p>
<p>The study found that the three-year survival rate of 426 Medtronic leads inserted in the hospital&#8217;s patients was 90.8%, meaning 9.2% failed. In December 2009, <a title="Sprint Fidelis failure rate report" href="http://www.medcitynews.com/index.php/2009/12/sprint-fidelis-lead-woes-continue-to-haunt-medtronic-industry-as-fda-takes-notice/" target="_blank">one report estimated</a> the failure rate of the Sprint Fidelis lead may eventually reach 30% of all patients.</p>
<h4>Medtronic Heart Device Lawsuits</h4>
<p>In lawsuits against Medtronic, patients represented by Lieff Cabraser have alleged that a design defect is responsible for their lead fractures. The complaints also allege that Medtronic failed to act timely as it knew of large numbers of failures of the device at least a year prior to issuing the recall. Learn more about the <a title="Medtronic Heart Lead Recall website" href="http://www.medtronicheartleadrecall.com/index.htm" target="_blank">Medtronic heart lead recall</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/02/04/medtronic-heart-lead-recall-update-sprint-fidelis-lead-fracture-rate-is-increasing-exponentially-with-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: The Coal Ash Case &amp; New National Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/01/20/540/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/01/20/540/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic substances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tennessee coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 20, 2010, the New York Times ran a strong editorial on the late 2008 Coal Ash Spill in eastern Tennessee criticising the closed-door nature of resulting talks to create new national standards for the disposal of coal ash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 20, 2010, the <em>New York Times</em> ran a strong editorial on the late 2008 Coal Ash Spill in eastern Tennessee criticising the closed-door nature of resulting talks to create new national standards for the disposal of coal ash.</p>
<p>Just over a year ago, one billion tons of toxic coal sludge broke loose from a containment pond belonging to the Tennessee Valley Authority, burying hundreds of acres of Roane County and threatening local water supplies and air quality. The Environmental Protection Agency immediately promised new national standards to replace a patchwork of uneven — and in many cases weak — state toxic materials regulations.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the agency&#8217;s (non-public) recommendations are now the focus of a huge dispute inside the Obama administration, with industry lobbying hard for changes that would essentially preserve the status quo. The Times opines that the dispute should be resolved in favor of the environment and public safety.</p>
<p><a title="The Coal Ash Case: NYT" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/opinion/20wed4.html?ref=opinion" target="_blank">Click here to read the full piece on the</a><em><a title="The Coal Ash Case: NYT" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/opinion/20wed4.html?ref=opinion" target="_blank"> New York Times</a></em><a title="The Coal Ash Case: NYT" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/opinion/20wed4.html?ref=opinion" target="_blank"> website</a>. You can <a title="Tennessee Coal Ash Spill Lawsuit Information" href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/environmental/coal-ash.htm" target="_self">learn more about lawsuits relating to the Tennessee coal sludge spill here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/01/20/540/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Side Effects of Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella Birth Control Pills Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/12/11/side-effects-of-yazyasminocella-birth-control-pills-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/12/11/side-effects-of-yazyasminocella-birth-control-pills-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scassidy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lieff Cabraser attorney Wendy Fleishman answers a series of frequently asked questions concerning the birth control drugs Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella and their side effects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We wish to educate young women as to the serious side effects linked to Yaz and Yasmin and their legal rights if they have been injured,&#8221; stated attorney Wendy Fleishman today as she issued a series of <a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/yaz-faq.htm">answers to frequently asked questions concerning the birth control drugs Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella</a>.</p>
<p>Ms. Fleishman also discusses the risks of these drugs in a YouTube video entitled:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIkl-5Fk_9o">Yaz | Yasmin Drug Side Effects &amp; Dangers Explained</a></p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured or died as a result of taking Yaz or Yasmin, please visit Lieff Cabraser online at <a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com%2Fmedical%2Fyasmin-yaz.htm&amp;esheet=6118768&amp;lan=en_US&amp;anchor=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com%2Fmedical%2Fyasmin-yaz.htm&amp;index=2&amp;md5=86dffbf87949eeefa13029b74b32be60">http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/yasmin-yaz.htm</a> or call us toll-free at 1-800-541-7358. Our personal injury attorneys and legal nurse consultants will promptly review your case for no charge or obligation on your part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/12/11/side-effects-of-yazyasminocella-birth-control-pills-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUV Rollover Lawsuit:  Court won&#8217;t disturb $82.6M award in Ford rollover case</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/30/court-wont-disturb-82-6m-award-in-ford-suv-rollover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/30/court-wont-disturb-82-6m-award-in-ford-suv-rollover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rollover accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rejecting Ford's challenge to the award, the Supreme Court has left in place an $82.6 million award to a woman who was paralyzed after her Ford Explorer rolled over]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Mercury News</em> reports that the Supreme Court has left in place an $82.6 million award to a woman who was paralyzed after her Ford Explorer rolled over. The justices on Monday rejected Ford Motor Co.&#8217;s challenge to the portion of the award, $55 million, that was intended as punitive damages. Ford argued that it should not be punished because its design of the vehicle met federal safety standards.</p>
<p>A California state appeals court earlier rejected Ford&#8217;s contention and upheld the award to Benetta Buell-Wilson. She was driving on an interstate east of San Diego in January 2002 when she swerved to avoid a metal object and lost control of her 1997 Explorer, which rolled 4 1/2 times. The mother of two was paralyzed from the waist down when the roof collapsed on her neck, severing her spine.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_13893252">Read the full article</a> on the <em>San Jose Mercury News</em> site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/30/court-wont-disturb-82-6m-award-in-ford-suv-rollover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Cancer and Link to Hormone-Replacement Therapy Drugs: Trial Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/24/drugmakers-get-double-dose-of-bad-news-over-hormone-replacement-therapy-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/24/drugmakers-get-double-dose-of-bad-news-over-hormone-replacement-therapy-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health - women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hormone replacement therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upjohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyeth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Philadelphia jury returned a $28 million punitive damages verdict Monday against two drugmakers over the drugmakers' hormone-replacement therapy drugs that the jury found caused a plaintiff's breast cancer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Philadelphia jury returned a $28 million punitive damages verdict Monday against two drugmakers over the drugmakers&#8217; hormone-replacement therapy drugs that the jury found caused a plaintiff&#8217;s breast cancer. And a $75 million punitive damages verdict from the end of October in another hormone-replacement therapy, or HRT, mass tort case was unsealed by court order after the other jury verdict was rendered around 2 p.m. Monday.</p>
<p>On Friday, the jury in Kendall v. Wyeth awarded more than $6 million in compensatory damages to plaintiffs Donna Kendall and John Kendall Jr., their attorneys said. In the punitive damages part of the case decided Monday, the jury awarded $16 million against Wyeth, which is now owned by Pfizer, and $12 million against Pharmacia &amp; Upjohn, which also is now owned by Pfizer. The total verdict adds up to more than $34 million.</p>
<p>Read the full article on law.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/24/drugmakers-get-double-dose-of-bad-news-over-hormone-replacement-therapy-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yaz Lawsuit: Mother Alleges Yaz Birth Control Drug Almost Killed Her Daughter</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/23/pa-mother-alleges-her-daughter-almost-died-from-side-effects-of-bayers-prescription-drug-yaz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/23/pa-mother-alleges-her-daughter-almost-died-from-side-effects-of-bayers-prescription-drug-yaz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yasmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personal injury lawsuit filed against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Corporation for severe and lasting injuries caused by Bayer's prescription drug Yaz]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/bios/fleishman.php">Wendy R. Fleishman</a> of the national plaintiffs&#8217; law firm <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/">Lieff Cabraser Heimann &amp; Bernstein, LLP</a> announced that Dana Kraus, on behalf of her sixteen-year old daughter, Katie Kraus, filed a personal injury lawsuit against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Corporation for severe and lasting injuries caused by Bayer&#8217;s prescription drug Yaz. The lawsuit was filed in the Court of Common Pleas for Philadelphia County.</p>
<p>&#8220;While prescribed Yaz, my daughter developed several pulmonary emboli, which obstructed her pulmonary artery and caused her to suffer cardiac arrest. My baby was dead for almost three minutes,&#8221; stated Dana Kraus. &#8220;She was in excellent health prior to taking Yaz. This was a terrifying experience. We almost lost her. We were so lucky. The doctors at Children&#8217;s Hospital of Pittsburgh were able to save her life.&#8221; Pulmonary emboli are blood clots in the lungs that can lead to abnormally low blood pressure and sudden death.</p>
<p>&#8220;As alleged in the <a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/yasmin-yaz.htm">Complaint, Yaz is a dangerous prescription drug</a> sold without adequate warnings about the risks of serious and fatal injuries,&#8221; stated attorney Wendy R. Fleishman. &#8220;Bayer failed to warn doctors and patients that Yaz poses a greater risk of serious side than previous generations of oral contraceptives.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/11/23/pa-mother-alleges-her-daughter-almost-died-from-side-effects-of-bayers-prescription-drug-yaz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yaz Side Effects:  Nurse Charges Yaz Birth Control Drug &#8220;Altered My Life&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/10/21/nurse-charges-dangerous-yaz-birth-control-drug-altered-my-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/10/21/nurse-charges-dangerous-yaz-birth-control-drug-altered-my-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiff attorneys at Lieff Cabraser today filed a personal injury lawsuit against Bayer Corporation and Bayer Healthcare Pharmacuticals, Inc., for severe side effects from the prescription birth control drug Yaz, manufactured and marketed by Bayer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National plaintiffs’ law firm <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/">Lieff Cabraser Heimann &amp; Bernstein, LLP </a>announced that Candice Atkinson today filed a personal injury lawsuit against Bayer Corporation and Bayer Healthcare Pharmacuticals, Inc., for severe <a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/medical/yasmin-yaz.htm">side effects from the prescription birth control drug Yaz</a>, manufactured and marketed by Bayer. The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, where Bayer Healthcare Pharmacuticals, Inc., is located.</p>
<p>Atkinson, age 33 of Rock Hill, South Carolina, charges that Yaz is a dangerous prescription drug sold without adequate warnings about the risk of serious injuries. Atkinson further alleges that Bayer improperly advertised and over-promoted Yaz for uses such as treating acne, knowing that the risks of such use outweighed any benefits Yaz may have for acne sufferers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.personalinjurylawyeramerica.com/press-releases/20091022-yaz.php">Learn more&#8230;.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/10/21/nurse-charges-dangerous-yaz-birth-control-drug-altered-my-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
