<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Injury Law Blog and News &#187; Medical malpractice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/category/medical-malpractice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw</link>
	<description>Product Recall, Consumer Safety, and Personal Injury Litigation News and Commentary from National Plaintiffs&#039; Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gross Medical Malpractice: Wrong Body Part Hospital Errors Increasing</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2011/06/20/gross-medical-malpractice-wrong-body-part-hospital-errors-increasing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2011/06/20/gross-medical-malpractice-wrong-body-part-hospital-errors-increasing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Joint Commission, a Chicago-based group that accredits the nation’s hospitals, estimates, based on state data, that wrong-site surgery occurs 40 times a week in the U.S., as reported by the Washington Post in an extensive article on these medical errors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Joint Commission, a Chicago-based group that accredits the nation’s hospitals, estimates, based on state data, that wrong-site surgery occurs 40 times a week in the U.S., as reported by the <em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/the-pain-of-wrong-site-surgery/2011/06/07/AGK3uLdH_story.html?tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost&amp;tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost" target="_blank">Washington Post</a> </em>in an extensive article on these medical errors.</p>
<p>Wrong-site surgery, which includes such errors as amputating the wrong leg, performing the wrong operation or removing a kidney from the wrong patient, was up to 93 in 2010, compared with 49 in 2004. Reporting to the Commission is voluntary however, and the Commission thinks that the estimate of 40 wrong-site surgeries a week is based on limited data and may in fact underestimate the extent of these medical errors. Reported cases were the tip of the iceberg, one director of surgery stated.</p>
<p>Studies of wrong-site errors have consistently revealed a failure by physicians to undertake, prior to surgery, standardized procedures and teamwork.</p>
<p>The issue of medical errors is receiving more attention in light of broader medical errors that, according to a recent Health Affairs study, affect one-third of hospital patients.</p>
<p>To read more about medical errors and your rights, please visit our <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/practices/53/hospital-errors" target="_blank">Hospital Errors</a> page. If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of a medical error, please <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/forms.php?id=371">click here to contact a medical malpractice attorney</a> | lawyer at Lieff Cabraser or call us toll-free at 1-800-541-7358 and ask to speak to attorney <a href="http://www.lieffcabraser.com/attorneys/33/heather-a-foster">Heather Foster</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2011/06/20/gross-medical-malpractice-wrong-body-part-hospital-errors-increasing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Danger of Excessive Radiation From Hospital Radiation Therapy Profiled</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/01/28/danger-of-excessive-radiation-from-hospital-radiation-therapy-profiled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/01/28/danger-of-excessive-radiation-from-hospital-radiation-therapy-profiled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While new radiation technologies have brought benefits, they have also created new avenues for error in software and operation. A single error can be repeated in multiple radiation sessions for scores of patients, triggering new cancers and other injuries for patients. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The over radiation of patients receiving radiation therapy is often not disclosed to patients or reported to public health authorities. In many cases, the mistakes continue for months because the hospital has no system in place to catch the errors.</p>
<p>The <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/us/27radiation.html?scp=2&amp;sq=radiation&amp;st=cse" target="_blank">recently published an in-depth investigation on the excessive radiation of patients</a> at medical facilities across America, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>In New Jersey, 36 cancer patients at a veterans hospital in East Orange were over radiated &#8212; and 20 more received substandard treatment &#8212; by a medical team that lacked experience in using a machine that generated high-powered beams of radiation.</li>
<li>In Louisiana, a prostate cancer patient received twice the prescribed amount of radiation because he was treated with a new machine that the hospital made a miscalculation even with training instructors still on site.</li>
<li>In Texas, a patient suffered severe radiation injuries after a medical physicist who said he was overworked failed to detect a mistake.</li>
<li>In California, more than 300 patients in four hospitals &#8212; and possibly many more &#8212; were over radiated by powerful CT scans used to detect strokes. The overdoses were first discovered at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, a major Los Angeles hospital, where 260 patients received up to eight times as much radiation as intended.</li>
</ul>
<p>These deadly errors often could have been avoided if the medical providers had followed basic safety protocols as well as ensured that their protocols provided sufficient patient safety.</p>
<p>Lieff Cabraser has successfully represented <a href="http://lieffcabraser.com/personal-injury-mass-torts/case/157/vanderbilt-radiation-exposure-lawsuit">patients improperly exposed to radiation by medical providers</a>.  If you or a loved one suffered a severe injury due to excessive radiation as a patient, we can assist you in holding the hospital or medical facility accountable.  Please <a href="http://lieffcabraser.com/forms.php?id=371">click here to contact a Lieff Cabraser personal injury attorney</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2010/01/28/danger-of-excessive-radiation-from-hospital-radiation-therapy-profiled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California medical malpractice law in spotlight; &#8220;250 cases&#8221; cause dismay</title>
		<link>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/09/21/california-medical-malpractice-law-in-spotlight-250-cases-cause-shock-and-dismay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/09/21/california-medical-malpractice-law-in-spotlight-250-cases-cause-shock-and-dismay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[access to justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[award caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MICRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California's malpractice award caps effectively leave many injured and even killed by medical malpractice without legal recourse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne Volkmuth learned what a &#8220;250 case&#8221; was while conducting research shortly after the loss of his 7-year-old son, Ryan, who died three years ago during a dental procedure at a Palo Alto clinic. As a story in the San Francisco Chronicle describes, the &#8220;250&#8243; refers to $250,000, the largest amount Volkmuth could recover in a medical malpractice claim over his disabled son&#8217;s death, a limit set 34 years ago by California&#8217;s landmark medical malpractice law. It&#8217;s also the reason his case was turned down by most of the dozen medical malpractice attorneys he and his wife consulted.</p>
<p>With the malpractice cap set at $250,000, few attorneys will consider championing such cases, as the economics of the court system render such quests, however noble, as basically senseless and unavailing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/09/21/MNT619P7NH.DTL#ixzz0RketHdQa">Read</a> the full article on the SF Gate website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lieffcabraserblogs.com/injurylaw/2009/09/21/california-medical-malpractice-law-in-spotlight-250-cases-cause-shock-and-dismay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

